Skip to content
  • product-portfolio
  • ecosystem-catalog
  • deep-dives
  • marketplace

Marketplace, Ecosystem, App Store & Partner Platform - Analysis

Planning-layer analysis for category 28. It groups the 50 candidate services into capabilities, recommends what becomes a standalone service versus a module, and captures domain, interface, and non-functional notes. For the plain item list see the browse page.

Scope & Bounded Context

  • Primary bounded context: Marketplace & Ecosystem
  • Group: marketplace
  • Default wave / cycle: Phase 5 · Cycle 5: Marketplace & Ecosystem
  • Items: 50 candidates

This category is anchored to the ConnectSoft DDD baseline in the SaaS framework DDD blueprint and the service classification model.

Classification Breakdown

Classification Count
Connector 1
Module-in-service 41
Platform Product 1
Portal/UI Module 6
Workflow Template 1

Anti-fragmentation stance

Per ADR-0011, the 41 module candidates below are delivered inside the Marketplace & Ecosystem bounded-context service, not as separate microservices. Only the 1 platform/service candidates justify an independent runtime.

Standalone Service / Platform Candidates

ID Service Tier Status
CS-SVC-1400 ConnectSoft Ecosystem Hub 3 Planned

Connector Candidates

  • Connector Marketplace (CS-SVC-1354) - plugin in the Connector Runtime.

Portal / UI Modules

  • Partner Portal (CS-SVC-1356)
  • Third-Party Developer Portal (CS-SVC-1381)
  • Developer Documentation Portal (CS-SVC-1383)
  • Partner Support Portal (CS-SVC-1391)
  • Marketplace Trust Center (CS-SVC-1398)
  • Ecosystem Health Dashboard (CS-SVC-1399)

Domain, Interfaces & Data Ownership

  • Aggregates are owned by the Marketplace & Ecosystem context; cross-context reads go through published contracts, never shared databases.
  • Integration is event-first (outbox + integration events) per the event-driven mindset.
  • APIs are contract-first and versioned through the API & Integration context.

Non-Functional Posture

  • Multi-tenancy & edition-awareness: required for all serious candidates.
  • Security: Standard baseline; secrets via the platform secret store; least privilege.
  • Compliance: standard audit logging.
  • Observability: OpenTelemetry traces, metrics, and structured logs.

MVP vs Future

  • MVP (Tier 0-1): Partner Billing Service, Marketplace Billing Integration
  • Future (Tier 4-5): none

Open Questions

  • Which module candidates, if any, develop independent scaling or ownership needs that would justify promotion to a standalone service?
  • Where do this category's contracts overlap with adjacent contexts, and who owns them?