Skip to content
  • product-portfolio
  • ecosystem-catalog
  • deep-dives
  • core

Developer Experience, SDLC, QA & Software Factory - Analysis

Planning-layer analysis for category 10. It groups the 50 candidate services into capabilities, recommends what becomes a standalone service versus a module, and captures domain, interface, and non-functional notes. For the plain item list see the browse page.

Scope & Bounded Context

  • Primary bounded context: Developer Factory
  • Group: core
  • Default wave / cycle: Phase 2 · Cycle 1: AI Factory SaaS
  • Items: 50 candidates

This category is anchored to the ConnectSoft DDD baseline in the SaaS framework DDD blueprint and the service classification model.

Classification Breakdown

Classification Count
Microservice 3
Module-in-service 42
Platform Product 2
Portal/UI Module 2
Workflow Template 1

Anti-fragmentation stance

Per ADR-0011, the 42 module candidates below are delivered inside the Developer Factory bounded-context service, not as separate microservices. Only the 5 platform/service candidates justify an independent runtime.

Standalone Service / Platform Candidates

ID Service Tier Status
CS-SVC-0452 Internal Platform Portal 1 Planned
CS-SVC-0459 Package Registry Service 1 Planned
CS-SVC-0461 Container Registry Management 1 Planned
CS-SVC-0484 Mock Server Service 1 Planned
CS-SVC-0500 Software Factory Control Tower 1 Documented

Portal / UI Modules

  • Developer Portal (CS-SVC-0451)
  • Engineering Metrics Dashboard (CS-SVC-0489)

Domain, Interfaces & Data Ownership

  • Aggregates are owned by the Developer Factory context; cross-context reads go through published contracts, never shared databases.
  • Integration is event-first (outbox + integration events) per the event-driven mindset.
  • APIs are contract-first and versioned through the API & Integration context.

Non-Functional Posture

  • Multi-tenancy & edition-awareness: required for all serious candidates.
  • Security: Standard baseline; secrets via the platform secret store; least privilege.
  • Compliance: standard audit logging.
  • Observability: OpenTelemetry traces, metrics, and structured logs.

MVP vs Future

  • MVP (Tier 0-1): Developer Portal, Internal Platform Portal, Service Catalog, Software Catalog, Golden Path Template Registry, Project Scaffolding Service, Repository Creation Service, Monorepo Management Service
  • Future (Tier 4-5): none

Open Questions

  • Which module candidates, if any, develop independent scaling or ownership needs that would justify promotion to a standalone service?
  • Where do this category's contracts overlap with adjacent contexts, and who owns them?